| ||
Lesson 1 - Tests and ReadingComprehension Test
Further Exercises
ReadingRead Bernard King's introduction (pages 1-5) in The Elements of the Runes King is probably a little harsh in his attitude towards the modern audience for the runes, and particularly towards the New Agers. Though we will uses various labels during this course such as "New Age" and "traditionalist", it has to be recognized they are generalizations and as such are dangerous. King's is a good book but not without flaws and like any text on this course, including the lectures, it must be read critically. We ask you to read not only to find out facts but to make you think about the issues. When King writes "Runes were originally designed to be used for both secular inscriptions and magical purposes" he is talking nonsense. The error is not in how runes were used, since they were indeed used for both purposes, but in presuming that he can know the intention behind them. There are no Vikings around to ask. Even if we were to have an early text explicitly stating "runes are designed to be used as ..", we could still not afford to take it at face value. We would have to know about the validity of its author and what enabled him to speak on behalf of his society. The word "design" implies purpose and planning which may well have not been the case when it comes to the runes. If they did indeed emerge out of early symbols carved on rocks, then it is likely there was an evolutionary process with their functions developing over time rather than ever being planned. It is likely that in human terms there was no single agency behind the runes' emergence and development. Every writer on the runes has to be constantly on their guard to avoid making statements which they cannot substantiate or which may mislead. To be fair to King he raises the question of the uncertainty of the runes' origins a few pages later but we have drawn attention to this particular statement in order to illustrate the care with which our students must read. Be alert as you read and questioning. Remember something is not true just because an author states it is. Always look for evidence and if the writer doesn't provide it, be willing to do further research to see if you can prove or disprove the claim. Now in Chapter 1 of Elements of the Runes read page 6 and 7 down to "created from the runes" Read the section entitled "The Word "Rune""on page 11 Read "Who Used the Runes?" on page 14. In Freya Aswynns Principles of Runes, chapter 1, read the section on page 4 entitled "Mystical Origins of the Runes" down to the end of the chapter. Note the apparent difference in the two approaches. King is quite detached and scholarly in style, Aswynn is more emotional and outspoken. Notice her used of terms like "dispicable" and "foolishness". She makes no pretence of impartiality or balance. There is nothing wrong with this but it should be borne in mind while reading her book. It illustrates a point that the runes are something of major significance in the life of a runemaster and as such will inevitably generate strong opinions. As students you will often have to learn to listen to conflicting views expressed with equal conviction and make up your own mind. Read the Rune School Topic - Are the Runes Evil?
You have completed the exercises. Select the following link for the answers Please ensure you mark these exercises before moving on to the next lesson and do not take more than one Lesson a week. If you have any questions, comments or difficulties with the exercises and you have formally registered with the Rune School please email coursehelp@werewood.com |